No controls, no electron micrographs in Montagnier and Gallo 'HIV' isolation experiments

From Mia Breeze's article: The OG no virus movement: The Perth group.

I just read Mia Breeze’s article published today on dpl’s Newsletter, which quotes passages from Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos’s writing from the Perth Group’s publication, HIV - A virus like no other , and it is so worthwhile, I wanted to share it:

The OG no virus movement: The Perth group.

In the article, Mia Breeze gushes about Eleni’s acumen for figuring this stuff out, which we are all grateful for, since ‘science’ like this is behind paywalls and uses obfuscating jargon. However, when you understand the simplicity of what she demonstrated, this is complete child’s play and makes you wonder how can we live in a world where reasonable adults are either duped or go along with this nonsense, taking 14 years to finally do a control experiment to replicate the original work. It’s just common sense:

The control groups from the Gluschankof and Bess experiments show no differences with the ‘infected’ groups. The Montagnier and Gallo experiments had NO controls.

The electron micrographs from the Gluschankof experiment show no differences between the ‘infected’ and control micrographs, and as you can see, does not isolate anything, just as Charles Dauguet said “what we have seen all the time is cellular debris, no virus particles.” Montagnier and Gallo did NOT show any electron micrographs.

Ooh, look, globules and rods, but no triangular or star shapes, except for that weird diamond shape in (b). It must be a ‘virus’! From: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F918d9d85-60ae-43a8-a334-f6b5f3e97910_1001x999.jpeg

The electrophoresis results from the Bess experiment ‘infected’ samples (the C line below) do not show the ‘15 additional proteins’ thought to be part of ‘HIV retroviruses’:

from https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2d1a32c6-4461-4033-8359-f37952341828_817x757.png

Luc Montagnier goes on to win the Nobel Prize for ‘discovering’ ‘HIV’. Of course, there’s a long list of other winners who did not actually do what was claimed, but that’s for another article! Imagine you enter a middle school science fair without doing a control experiment- would you even qualify? Imagine you say you have proof of your claim but that including images was not necessary. But these are standard practices in ‘virology’. Clown world.

Also, Eleni’s excerpt talks about the supposed 1.16 g/ml density band that Montagnier and Gallo assumed would show the ‘HIV’, but how did they assume this? Weren’t they trying to isolate this stuff to begin with? Also, how did they assume that ‘HIV’ is made up of those 15 proteins? Maybe ATCC knows, since they supply all of the ‘virus strains’ that virologists buy to determine the ‘genetic sequences’ of ‘viruses’:

You can purchase the Omicron ‘variant’ of ‘SARS-CoV-2’ for only $1200 from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection): https://www.atcc.org/products/vr-3347hk

For a compelling read on the whole AIDS agenda and the odious Robert Gallo, I highly recommend you read Virus Mania by Torsten Engelbrecht, et al.

Thanks for reading.