This is part of a series of articles I’m writing concerning what we know and what we think we know but actually don’t. I’ve already written about DNA tests, ChatGPT, the cosmic microwave background, the archetypes of controversial issues, and word/people origins as described by Godfrey Higgins in Anacalypsis. One of the central themes or lessons resulting from the plandemic agendas is to hone our skills at discernment of all the information and belief systems that are built on top of each other, so that you’re on a solid foundation, not a house of cards.
The Einstein paper that I’m referring to is posted here: https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf , although it’s been formatted into PDF and not a facsimile of the original German or English printings.
Full disclosure: Albert Einstein was my idol as a teenager. In high school I wore a shirt with his image with a quote saying: “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Ironic indeed. Well have you ever thought, where and when did Einstein say all of these quotes? Do we have audio or video of them? Was it in English or German or Yiddish? I’ve done searches to see if there are ANY videos/audio of Einstein talking in English off the cuff and not from some script, but could not find any. Yes, I understand his videos are mostly from the early 20th century, but if you can find any, please share! You can find scripted remarks, but none off the cuff, for what seems to be the most quoted person of all time- or is that Lincoln?!
Anyways, when I was a physics major at the University of Texas at Austin, the post-doc that taught our physics lab detailed how E = m * c squared was never actually in one of his Annus Mirabilis (miracle year 1905) papers, https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf , and that the sound-bite version of the actual formula is only for the condition where the mass is at rest.
We have to extrapolate from our own experiences that most ideas are shortened to fit sound bites. Also, the notation ‘c’ as the constant for the speed of light only gained traction decades after his paper, which used ‘V’. And they will never give an exact measurement for the speed of light, because how can you measure it? You would need light itself and some way to transmit the information back to the observer, which requires light and time, etc., so these things are approximations:
By the way, I am not a fan of Veritasium or anyone that conspires with Youtube/the establishment. Nevertheless, the supposed speed in a perfect vacuum is about 299,792,458 meters per second, which if you know about the Great Pyramid of Giza, matches the latitude coordinate of the center of the Benben capstone, if it weren’t stolen. Zooming in on Google maps, the center of the capstone is about 29.979164481700217, 31.134196931061823 , but whether this corresponds to the speed of light, I don’t know.
I also took a class taught by the chairman of the physics department at that time, Austin Gleeson, who was involved with the Superconducting Supercollider project that was supposed to discover the Higgs Boson, the so-called ‘God Particle’. They actually dug out a substantial amount of the the tunnels underneath Waxahachie, Texas for the 54 mile particle accelerator, but maybe you’ll recall Congress nixed the plans after billions were already spent. And of course they tell us that indeed the ‘God Particle’ was ‘discovered’ at CERN, unifying the four forces of institutional physics. Is this what you believe? Well, we won’t spin out to that tangent for now.
Anyways, Steven Weinberg, who supposedly unified three of the four forces (along with Abdus Salam and Sheldon Glashow, and is one of the architects of the Standard Model of physics), greeted me in the hallway, and I attended one of his talks. I had already read his The First 3 Minutes, so was fully indoctrinated by the Jesuit Big Bang illusion and cosmic background radiation, which I’ve addressed in my WMAP Satellite article. I also admired Ilya Prigogine, because I was into all of those illusions and titles, and he was the other Nobel Laureate on campus along with Weinberg, so I saw him walk down also, and later read his and Isabelle Stengers’ Order Out of Chaos, which had a big impact on me. And I took a class taught by String theorist and D-brane inventor, Joe Polchinski, who everyone thought was a genius (sadly, he passed away too early a few years ago). George Sudarshan was also at UT, many others.
Now for my main focus, here are the five main errors in Einstein’s special relativity paper, ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, that John Walker footnoted for this PDF version (There are other errors and typos, but I wanted to focus on these main ones). We all have heard how everyone, including physicists, joke that no one except Einstein and Arthur Eddington understood relativity. Well, if these errors were ‘propagated’ for decades without anyone noticing, as the footnotes point out, then this is probably close to the truth. So don’t try to comprehend the below screenshots! I will quote the ‘Editor’s note’s below each screenshot just for easy searching, but the screenshots will have them as well:
Editor’s note: In Einstein’s original paper, the symbols (Ξ, H, Z) for the co-ordinates of the moving system k were introduced without explicitly defining them. In the 1923 English translation, (X,Y, Z) were used, creating an ambiguity between X co-ordinates in the fixed system K and the parallel axis in moving system k. Here and in subsequent references we use Ξ when referring to the axis of system k along which the system is translating with respect to K. In addition, the reference to system K’ later in this sentence was incorrectly given as “k” in the 1923 English translation.
Editor’s note: This equation was incorrectly given in Einstein’s original paper and the 1923 English translation as a = tan[to the negative 1 power] [times] w[sub y]/w[sub x].
Editor’s note: “X” in the 1923 English translation.
Editor’s note: In the 1923 English translation, the quantities “ζ” [zeta] and “ξ” [xi] were interchanged in the second equation. They were given correctly in the the original 1905 paper.
Editor’s note: Erroneously given as “l’” in the 1923 English translation, propagating an error, despite a change in symbols, from the original 1905 paper.
Since Einstein’s work was a paradigm shift for humanity, I don’t understand how the physicists responsible in 1923 for translating to English, Einstein's original 1905 paper on special relativity in German, propagated such mistakes, and that editors and subsequent physicists, including Einstein, could not catch them. Does this mean that even the top physicists misunderstood these concepts and that less spectacular papers would also propagate even more errors? Imagine how many thousands of other less-scrutinized, less famous papers have egregious mistakes.
I’ve watched many videos debunking Special Relativity (I’m not focusing on General Relativity here.), and here are some:
Stephen Crothers:
Ken Wheeler reads Oleg D. Jefimenko’s refutation of relativity theory:
GPS is what many point to as evidence for special relativity, but take a closer look:
Ray Fleming:
Thanks to reader, Solomon, for reminding me of Miles Mathis’s site, including this page on his special relativity paper: http://milesmathis.com/five.html .
Here is Teslas’s quote from a 1935 New York Times interview:
The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.
But again, don’t take Tesla’s or my word or anyone’s words about anything. Connect the dots for yourself, and what it means for those errors to propagate without any physicist correcting the mistakes for years.
So I hope you’re catching the points I’m trying to make with all of this:
science uses complex abstractions so advanced, that not even the foremost experts can catch the errors
science purposely uses these complex abstractions as a way to confuse the layperson so that everyone is at a loss when even trying to address an issue
this complexity does not correspond to the beauty and Logos/proportionality/ratios/logic of nature
Carl Sagan points out what is happening to society right now before our eyes:
Thanks for reading, and feel free to comment below.
I don’t claim to be an expert, but this is the logic that some of these vids didn’t mention like Crothers.
From what I’ve read over the years, the speed of light is not like sound with a definite speed relative to some underlying medium, it is always the same. Two different observers moving relative to each other, each measuring the speed of the same blob of light relative to himself will both get c even if their relative motion is in the same direction as the motion of the blob of light. When we measure its speed we always get the same result. This means that time is not definitive.
I’m happy if there is another explanation of all of this ‘cause I don’t have a dog in the fight.
Reference
https://galileoandeinstein.phys.virginia.edu/lectures/srelwhat.html
Einstein may have been wrong, but the bigger pic is that atomic bombs (exist or not), nuc reactors, particle accelerators, planetary exploration etc are a way to keep country to country fear going, arms and tech races, and essentially monetize physics and bring in more world control.